Primary sources · Judgment

FARAT HUSSAIN Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

High Court of Delhi · CRL.M.C. - 2197/2026 · 20 Aug 2026


Reproduced as issued. This is the text of the document as published by High Court of Delhi, ingested automatically and not edited, summarised or interpreted. Refer to the original document for the authoritative text.
Incomplete metadata. Some expected fields could not be read from the source. They are shown as missing rather than filled in:
  • Delhi High Court adapter: text extracted by Firecrawl; the source PDF was not retrieved, so no original file is archived.

$~32

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 20.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010115952026 + CRL.M.C. 2197/2026

FARAT HUSSAIN .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Nasimuddin, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State. Respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Petitioner seeks quashing of Complaint Case No. 450/2022 of Police Station Kalyan Puri, Delhi for offence under Section 354/354A/354D/341 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has settled the disputes with the petitioner.

State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.

The respondent no. 2 is present in Court today and is identified by CRL.M.C. 2197/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages

counsel for petitioner (this is a Criminal Complaint Case). I have spoken with respondent no. 2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all her disputes with the petitioner. Respondent no. 2 submits that she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioner. It is specifically stated by respondent no.2 that she is undergoing some medical treatment for a complicated disease, so she has opted to settle the dispute without expecting any monetary compensation. Respondent no.2 also submits in response to a specific query that she does not want time to think again.

Having spoken with respondent no. 2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through a full dress trial.

Therefore, the petition is allowed and Complaint Case No. 450/2022 of Police Station Kalyan Puri, Delhi for offence under Section 354/354A/354D/341 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same pending in the Court of Ms. Ritika Kansal, JMFC, East, Karkardooma Court are quashed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE)

AUGUST 20, 2026/ry

CRL.M.C. 2197/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages

Primary source: High Court of DelhiView original document →

← All primary sources

FARAT HUSSAIN Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. | JurisIntel