Primary sources · Judgment

RAHUL GAUTAM & ORS. Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

High Court of Delhi · CRL.M.C. - 6084/2026 · 19 Aug 2026


Reproduced as issued. This is the text of the document as published by High Court of Delhi, ingested automatically and not edited, summarised or interpreted. Refer to the original document for the authoritative text.
Incomplete metadata. Some expected fields could not be read from the source. They are shown as missing rather than filled in:
  • Delhi High Court adapter: text extracted by Firecrawl; the source PDF was not retrieved, so no original file is archived.

$~90

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: 19.08.2026

CNR No. DLHC010385762026

CRL.M.C. 6084/2026 & CRL.M.A. 25462/2026

RAHUL GAUTAM & ORS. .....Petitioners

Through: Mr. Vivek Vishal Gautam, Advocate

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the

State with IO/SI Mahesh Chand and

ASI Sanjay

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 136/2023 of PS Badarpur

for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the

complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with

the petitioners and now they are living together.

Learned APP for the State assisted by IO/SI Mahesh Chand accepts

notice and submits that State has no objection to this petition.

Respondent no. 2, present in Court and identified by the IO, also

CRL.M.C. 6084/2026

Page 1 of 2 pages accepts notice.

I have spoken with respondent no. 2 in Hindi and it is stated by her

that now she has settled all her disputes with the petitioners. It is stated by

her that for past about 2½ years, she is living with the petitioners happily. It

is also stated by her that from her wedlock with petitioner no. 1, one son was

born earlier and now recently she has given birth to another son, both of

whom are living with her and the petitioners. The respondent no. 2

specifically submits that she does not wish to continue prosecution of the

petitioners because now they are living together.

Having spoken with respondent no. 2, I am satisfied that it would in

the interest of justice not to push them through full dress trial. Therefore, the

present petition and the accompanying application are allowed and

consequently, the FIR No. 136/2023 of PS Badarpur for offence under

Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out the same are

quashed.

Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA

DN: =7N, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,

2.5.420=8401dd898b7a77b26f55ffe4af

e4c5569af3962fc8fb483d4534df8766cacc

a,ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI/CID -

7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi,

serialNumber=e38769541e4c507b5d

15570996b4080cbd2e000402487695f

f801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA

Date: 2026.08.19 17:09:29 +05:30

**AUGUST 19, 2026/**rs

GIRISH KATHPALIA

(JUDGE)

CRL.M.C. 6084/2026

Page 2 of 2 pages

Primary source: High Court of DelhiView original document →

← All primary sources

RAHUL GAUTAM & ORS. Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR | JurisIntel