STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC. VS. SUDHIR S/O MOTIRAMJI HIWARKAR AND ORS. ETC.

ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.7 SECTION III

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal Nos.2963-2964/2016

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC. Appellants

VERSUS

SUDHIR S/O MOTIRAMJI

HIWARKAR AND ORS. ETC. & ORS. Respondents

[HIGH ON BOARD]

Date : 12-08-2026 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.

Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR

Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv.

Ms. Sushmita Pandey, Adv.

Ms. Arunima Das, Adv.

Mr. Ashwin Arun Hirulkar, Adv.

Ms. Kunika Bansal, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. T Srinivasa Murthy, Adv.

Ms. Iyer Shruti Gopal, AOR

Mr. Anandh K., Adv.

Mr. Rohit P Masurkar, Adv.

Mr. Ang Bajaj, Adv.

Mr. Hersh Desai, Adv.

Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Khanna, Adv.

Mr. Mayank Kaushik, Adv.

Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. Heard-in-part.

2. This Court while granting leave to appeal vide order dated 11th March,

2016 stayed the operation of clause (iv) of paragraph 26 of the impugned

judgment and order dated 07th October, 2015 passed by the High Court of

Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur. As a result thereof, the

respondent was not absorbed in any college.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent has informed us that he has attained

the age of superannuation on 30th November, 2025.

4. We require the State of Maharashtra to place before us a calculation of the

emoluments the respondent would have been entitled to, had he served as a

college lecturer between 07th October, 2015 and 30th November, 2025.

5. Such calculation must be placed on record by an affidavit, to be filed

within two weeks.

6. Re-list the civil appeals after three weeks.

(MANIK KUMAR) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)

SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)