Primary sources · Order

RAJ KUMAR VS. PUNJAB AND SIND BANK

Supreme Court of India · 11 Aug 2026


Reproduced as issued. This is the text of the document as published by Supreme Court of India, ingested automatically and not edited, summarised or interpreted. Refer to the original document for the authoritative text.
Incomplete metadata. Some expected fields could not be read from the source. They are shown as missing rather than filled in:
  • Supreme Court adapter could not find a case number for diary number 269442026.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

INHERENT JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (C) No.9923/2026

IN

CIVIL APPEAL No.847/2026

RAJ KUMAR PETITIONER

VERSUS

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK RESPONDENT

O R D E R

1. Civil Appeal No. 847 of 2026 of the appellant-Bank was

allowed by this Court vide judgment and order dated 02nd April,

2026. Respondent in the said appeal has now applied for a review

of the said order.

2. Application, for listing the review petition in open court, is

rejected.

3. Having perused the order under review and the grounds

urged in support of the prayer made, we are of the considered

1

opinion that no case for review has been set up.

4. Consequently, the review petition is dismissed on merits.

5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

………………………………………J.

[DIPANKAR DATTA]

………………………………………J.

[SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA]

New Delhi;

August 11, 2026.

2

ITEM NO.1001 SECTION XIV-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

R.P.(C) No.9923/2026 in C.A. No.847/2026

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-04-2026

in C.A. No.847/2026 passed by the Supreme Court of India]

RAJ KUMAR Petitioner

VERSUS

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK Respondent

I.A. No.136707/2026-APPLICATION FOR LISTING REVIEW PETITION IN OPEN

COURT

Date : 11-08-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

By Circulation

UPON perusing papers the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. Application, for listing the review petition in open court, is rejected.

2. The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(MANIK KUMAR) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)

SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

(signed order is placed on the file)

3

Primary source: Supreme Court of IndiaView original document →

← All primary sources

RAJ KUMAR VS. PUNJAB AND SIND BANK | JurisIntel