Primary sources · Judgment

HUNNY Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

High Court of Delhi · BAIL APPLN. - 3304/2026 · 13 Aug 2026


Reproduced as issued. This is the text of the document as published by High Court of Delhi, ingested automatically and not edited, summarised or interpreted. Refer to the original document for the authoritative text.

BAIL APPLN. 3304/2026 Page 1 of 3 pages

$~80

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of Decision: 13.08.2026

# CNR No. DLHC010373932026

+ BAIL APPLN. 3304/2026 & CRL.M.A. 24700/2026

HUNNY .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Roshan Lal, Advocate.

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State

with SI Sonal Raj and SI Satender, PS

Bharat Nagar.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 627/2024 of

PS Bharat Nagar for offence under Section 109(1)/3(5) BNS.

2. Broadly speaking, allegation of the prosecution is that on the night

intervening 26.09.2024 and 27.09.2024, the complainant de facto suffered

stab injury on right scapular region and he alleged the assailants to be Suraj

and the present accused/applicant. According to prosecution case, the

stabbing was done by Suraj while the present accused/applicant was

BAIL APPLN. 3304/2026 Page 2 of 3 pages

accompanying Suraj.

3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that the alleged

assailant Suraj has already been released on bail. It is further submitted that

the complainant de facto in his chief-examination before the trial court

turned hostile to prosecution and stated that at the time of alleged incident,

he was consuming liquor and some unidentified person stabbed him.

4. Learned APP for State assisted by Investigating Officer/SI Sonal Raj

opposes the bail application on the ground that the accused/applicant had

absconded and could be arrested only after one year of the alleged incident.

Learned APP for State submits that the knife used in stabbing was handed

over to Suraj by the present accused/applicant. However, it is not denied that

the complainant de facto was discharged from hospital on the same day of

the incident and the MLC also shows that he was under influence of liquor.

5. Considering the overall circumstances described above, the bail

application is allowed and the accused/applicant is directed to be released on

bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with

one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

6. A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the concerned Jail

Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant.

BAIL APPLN. 3304/2026 Page 3 of 3 pages

7. Accompanying application also stands disposed of.

GIRISH KATHPALIA

(JUDGE)

AUGUST 13, 2026/dr

Primary source: High Court of DelhiView original document →

← All primary sources

HUNNY Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI | JurisIntel