Primary sources · Order

SAURABH RAVINDRA MEHENDALE VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Supreme Court of India · 13 Aug 2026


Reproduced as issued. This is the text of the document as published by Supreme Court of India, ingested automatically and not edited, summarised or interpreted. Refer to the original document for the authoritative text.
Incomplete metadata. Some expected fields could not be read from the source. They are shown as missing rather than filled in:
  • Supreme Court adapter could not find a case number for diary number 468962026.

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.2 SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s).

46896/2026

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order

dated 15-04-2026 in ABA No. 29/2026 passed by the

High Court of Judicature at Bombay]

SAURABH RAVINDRA MEHENDALE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)

IA No. 232205/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN

FILING

IA No. 232206/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF

THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

IA No. 232204/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 13-08-2026 This matter was called on for

hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Abhishek Rajendra Avachat, Adv.

Mr. Mazar Mujawar, Adv.

Mr. Sagar Pahune Patil, AOR

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raman Yadav,Adv.

Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.

Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

SLP (Crl.) Diary No(s). 46896/2026 1

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Issue notice, returnable in

four weeks.

Learned counsel appearing for

the respondent-State on advance

notice, prays for and is granted

four weeks time to file counter

affidavit. Hence, notice need not be

sent to the said respondent.

Notice be issued to

unrepresented respondents.

By way of an ad interim

order, in the event of arrest, the

petitioner shall be released on bail

in connection with FIR No. 177 of

2025 registered with Deccan Police

Station, District Pune, Gujarat,

subject to him executing a personal

SLP (Crl.) Diary No(s). 46896/2026 2

bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only),

with one or more sureties in the

like amount to the satisfaction of

the Investigating Officer.

However, the Petitioner is

directed to cooperate with the

investigation and report to the

Investigating Officer as and when

directed to do so.

(SONIA BHASIN)

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR-CUM-PS

(RANJANA SHAILEY)

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SLP (Crl.) Diary No(s). 46896/2026 3

Primary source: Supreme Court of IndiaView original document →

← All primary sources

SAURABH RAVINDRA MEHENDALE VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA | JurisIntel