Primary sources · Order

MOHD. ARIFUDDIN KHAN RASHEED VS. SADIQ ALI KHAN

Supreme Court of India · 06 Aug 2026


Reproduced as issued. This is the text of the document as published by Supreme Court of India, ingested automatically and not edited, summarised or interpreted. Refer to the original document for the authoritative text.
Incomplete metadata. Some expected fields could not be read from the source. They are shown as missing rather than filled in:
  • Supreme Court adapter could not find a case number for diary number 57002025.

ITEM NO.303 COURT NO.10 SECTION XII-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14496-

14498/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-11-2024

in IA No. 2/2024 07-11-2024 in AS No. 270/2022 07-11-2024 in AS No.

274/2022 passed by the High Court for The State of Telangana at

Hyderabad]

MOHD. ARIFUDDIN KHAN RASHEED Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SADIQ ALI KHAN & ORS. Respondent(s)

[PART HEARD BY : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN]

IA No. 35850/2026 - APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT

IA No. 16375/2026 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION

IA No. 81995/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT

IA No. 35851/2026 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT

WITH

SLP(C) No. 14499-14506/2025 (XII-A)

MD. RAZIUDDIN Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MOHD. JALALUDDIN KHAN QAMAR Respondent(s)

IA No. 35920/2026 - APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT

IA No. 22402/2026 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION

IA No. 109580/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT

IA No. 35921/2026 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT

IA No. 173165/2026 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION

Date : 06-08-2026 These matters were called for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ashok Reddy Kanathala, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, AoR

Ms. Deepika Kalia, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Narayan Tripathy, Adv.

Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. S S Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Abhishek Ritabh Shukla, AoR

Mr. Naman Jain, Adv.

Mr. Roshan Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Rashmi Singh, Adv.

Mr. Aashray Chopra, Adv.

Mr. Rohan Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Santosh Krishnan, AoR

Mr. Sonam Anand, Adv.

Ms. Palak Arora, Adv.

Mr. Ashwin Joseph, Adv.

Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv.

Ms. Esha Thawal, Adv.

Ms. Tatini Basu, AoR

Ms. Obulapuram Keerthi, Adv.

Mr. Kumar Shashank, Adv.

Mr. Ankur Prakash, AoR

Ms. Filza Moonis, AoR

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AoR

Mr. Kumar Ajit Singh, Adv.

Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Upadhyay, Adv.

Mr. Md. Ali, AoR

M/S. Varun Thakur & Associates, AoR

Mr. Ramkaran, Adv.

Mr. Varun Thakur & Associates, Adv.

Mr. Brajesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.

Mr. K. Venkata Rao, Adv.

Mr. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv.

Dr. M.K. Ravi, Adv.

Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AoR

Ms. Devina Sehgal, AoR

Mr. Srikanth Varma Mudunuru, Adv.

Mr. Yatharth Kansal, Adv.

O R D E R

At the outset, it has been pointed out that some respondents

have not been served in the proceedings.

2. Having regard to the nature of the dispute and the track

record, we deem it appropriate that every respondent is duly and

actually served in the present proceedings.

3. Accordingly, as prayed for by learned counsel for the

petitioners for ensuring service, permission to serve the unserved

respondents through dasti mode as also paper publication is

permitted.

4. The same be done within four weeks.

5. As prayed for, list on 22.09.2026 at 2.00 P.M.

6. In the meantime, interim orders passed by this Court on

09.05.2025 to continue till the next date of listing.

SLP(C) No(s). 14496-14498/2025

7. Interlocutory Application No. 16375 of 2026 seeking permission

to bring on record the legal representative of the deceased-

respondents No. 24,28 and 38 has been filed.

8. Application for substitution is allowed after condoning the

delay and setting aside abatement, at the risk and responsibility

of the petitioner.

9. Registry is directed to make necessary amendments in the cause

title.

10. Issue notice to the newly impleaded legal representatives of

the deceased respondents.

SLP(C) No(s). 14499-14506/2025

11. Interlocutory Applications No. 22402 and 173165 of 2026

seeking permission to bring on record the legal representative of

the deceased-respondents No. 28, 32, 37 and 29 have been filed.

12. Applications for substitution are allowed after condoning the

delay and setting aside abatement, at the risk and responsibility

of the petitioner.

13. Registry is directed to make necessary amendments in the cause

title.

14. Issue notice to the newly impleaded legal representatives of

the deceased respondents.

(SACHIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA) (ANJALI PANWAR)

COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Primary source: Supreme Court of IndiaView original document →

← All primary sources

MOHD. ARIFUDDIN KHAN RASHEED VS. SADIQ ALI KHAN | JurisIntel