Primary sources · Judgment

TUSHAR CHAUHAN Vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

High Court of Delhi · BAIL APPLN. - 2363/2026 · 12 Aug 2026


Reproduced as issued. This is the text of the document as published by High Court of Delhi, ingested automatically and not edited, summarised or interpreted. Refer to the original document for the authoritative text.

BAIL APPLNs. 2363/2026 & 2382/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages

$~2 & 3

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of Decision: 12.08.2026

# CNR No. DLHC010266572026

+ BAIL APPLN. 2363/2026

TUSHAR CHAUHAN .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate.

versus

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Rajat Nair, Mr. Dhruv Pande and

Mr. Imon Bhattacharya, Advocates.

# CNR No. DLHC010266992026

+ BAIL APPLN. 2382/2026

AKSHAY KUMAR .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Harsh Srivastava, Mr. Daksh

Kadian and Mr. Abhishek Singh,

Advocates.

versus

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Rajat Nair, Mr. Dhruv Pande and

Mr. Imon Bhattacharya, Advocates.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. The accused/applicants seek regular bail in case no. ECIR/DLZO-

II/03/2024 dated 16.03.2024 under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of

Money Laundering Act.

BAIL APPLNs. 2363/2026 & 2382/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages

2. At the outset, learned counsel for Directorate of Enforcement submits

that since co-accused persons namely Pravez Khan, Suraj Shat, Neeraj

Chauhan, Rajesh Kumar and Lovee Narula have already been granted bail

by this court and that order has not been challenged by DoE, so on grounds

of parity, the present accused/applicant also may be granted regular bail.

3. Accordingly, in view of detailed factual and legal matrix explained in

the orders granting bail to above named co-accused persons, both these bail

applications are allowed and both the accused/applicants are directed to be

released on bail subject to each of them furnishing a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the trial court and also subject to the condition that the

accused/applicants shall not leave India without obtaining permission from

the trial court.

4. Copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the concerned Jail

Superintendent for being conveyed to the accused/applicants.

GIRISH KATHPALIA

(JUDGE)

AUGUST 12, 2026/ry

Primary source: High Court of DelhiView original document →

← All primary sources

TUSHAR CHAUHAN Vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT | JurisIntel