Primary sources · Order

JOHRI VS. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Supreme Court of India · 04 Aug 2026


Reproduced as issued. This is the text of the document as published by Supreme Court of India, ingested automatically and not edited, summarised or interpreted. Refer to the original document for the authoritative text.
Incomplete metadata. Some expected fields could not be read from the source. They are shown as missing rather than filled in:
  • Supreme Court adapter could not find a case number for diary number 355162026.

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.15 SECTION II-D

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Miscellaneous Application No. 1983/2026 in SLP(Crl) No. 2065/2022

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-04-2022

in SLP(Crl) No. No. 2065/2022 passed by the Supreme Court of India]

JOHRI Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Respondent(s)

[EXTENSION OF TIME]

Date : 04-08-2026 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

For Petitioner(s) : By Courts Motion, AOR

Ms. Maheravish Rein, Adv.

Ms. Shamshravish Rein, Adv.

Mr. Aldanish Rein, AOR

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR

Mr. Anil Kaushik, ASG

Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tyagi, Adv.

Mr. Pranjal Singh, Adv.

Ms. Asta Singh, Adv. (not legible)

Ms. Rajeshwari Singh, Adv.

Mr. Mr. Anulkap Jain, Adv. (not legible)

Mr. Digvijay, Adv.

Mr. Prashant Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. On 17.07.2026, we had passed the following order:

A prayer for extension of time has been made

much after the expiry of the initial period

1

of four months granted by this Court for

conclusion of the trial vide order dated

04.04.2022. We also note that in the said

order, this Court had made observation that

if the trial is not concluded within the time

stipulated in 1 the said order, petitioner

would be at liberty to move an application

for bail.

2. This aspect needs clarification.

3. Registry to find out and submit a status

report by the next date.

4. List the matter on 04.08.2026.

Thereafter, the Special Judge, NDPS, New Delhi, has submitted

a report wherein it is stated that petitioner-accused Johri was

granted bail by the High Court of Delhi on 14.11.2022 in Bail

Application No.2630/2022. As per the said report, the trial is

going on but 8 months' further time may be required for conclusion

thereof.

2. Considering the above, we grant one year's time to the Trial

Court to conclude the trial.

3. Miscellaneous Application is disposed of.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(IRAMNAZ) (CHETNA BALOONI)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

2

Primary source: Supreme Court of IndiaView original document →

← All primary sources

JOHRI VS. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) | JurisIntel