Primary sources · Order
LOGANATHAN VS. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
- Supreme Court adapter could not find a case number for diary number 171032026.
1
Revised
(for appearance)
ITEM NO.310 COURT NO.10 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No.17103/2026
[Emanating from the Final Judgment and Order dated 18-02-2026
passed in SLP (Civil) No.8044/2025 passed by this Court]
LOGANATHAN Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU Respondents
[IA No.157121/2026 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No.156839/2026 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No.152525/2026 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No.182915/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN DEPOSITING COST
IA No.156984/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No.156840/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No.157127/2026 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No.156982/2026 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No.152528/2026 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT]
DATE : 05-08-2026 This matter was called for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. (Amicus Curiae),
Mr. Govind Jee, AoR
Mr. Naveen Soni, Adv.
Mr. Shaswat Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Adv.
For Petitioner :Ms. Purnima Krishna, AoR
Mr. N. Rajaraman, AoR
For Respondents :Ms. G. Indira, AoR
Mr. Prashanto Chandra Sen, AAG/Sr. Adv.
Mr. B. Karunakaran, AoR
Ms. Jayasri, Adv.
Mr. K. V. Mohan, AoR
Mr. Devadatt Kamat, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AoR
2
Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Revanta Solanki, Adv.
Ms. Vanshika Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Tewari, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Eliza Barr, Adv.
Ms. Anjali Saxena, Adv.
Mr. Govind Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya Rajawat, Adv.
Ms. Akansha, AoR
Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AoR
Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Tripathi, Adv.
Mr. S.D. Sanjay Bihar, Advocate General
Mr. Manish Kumar, AoR
Mr. Divyansh Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Kumar Saurav, Adv.
Ms. Nidhi Mittal, AoR
Mr. Gurjas Singh Narula, Adv.
Mr. Tirupati Gaurav Shahi, Adv.
Ms. Sugandha Jain, Sc, Adv.
Mr. Prabodh Kumar, AoR
Ms. Aastha Mehta, Adv.
Mr. Gursharan H. Virk, Adv.
Mr. Simranjit H. Virk, Adv.
Ms. Nancy Sheth, Adv.
Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AoR
Ms. Prerana Mohapatra, Adv.
Ms. Prina Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Priyal Sheth, Adv.
Mr. Mohit Paul, AoR
Ms. Rangoli Seth, Adv.
Mr. Rohit, Adv.
Mr. Anurag Pratyush Sahay, AoR
Ms. Pallavi Langar, AoR
M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AoR
Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ashritsai Torgal, Adv.
Mr. Abhishekh Singh, Adv.
Ms. Manisha T. Karia, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AoR
Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, AoR
3
Mr. H. K. Chaturvedi, AoR
Mrs. Anjali Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Sagar Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AoR
Mr. Karun Shamra, Adv.
Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv.
Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.
Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, AoR
Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AoR
Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.
Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv.
Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv.
Ms. Yanmi Phazang, Adv.
(For State of Nagaland)
Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AoR
Dr. Niranjan Moharana, Adv.
Mr. Amitabh Panda, Adv.
Ms. Laxmi, Adv.
Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G.
Ms. Shalini Singh, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, AoR
Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AoR
Dr. K. P. Kylasanatha Pillay, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Nitish Pande, Adv.
Ms. Rashmi Singhania, AoR
(for Municipal Commissioner, Kerala,
Thiruvananthpuram)
Mr. Manohar Pratap, AoR
Mr. Daksh Kidian, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Mishra, AoR
Mr. Basava Prabhu S Patil, Adv. Gen.
for State of Sikkim, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, AoR
Ms. Yachna Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Arushi Chopra, Adv.
Mr. Nalin Talwar, Adv.
Ms. Devina Sehgal, AoR
Mr. Srikanth Varma Mudunuru, Adv.
Mr. Yatharth Kansal, Adv.
4
Mr. Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv.
Mr. Shashank Singh, AoR
Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AoR
Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Varij Nayan Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, AoR
Mr. Swapnil Pattanayak, Adv.
Ms. Kratika Kushwaha, Adv.
Mr. Praveen Swarup, AoR
Mr. S.D. Sanjay, A.S.G.
Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv.
Mr. Prahalad Balaji, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Swarup, Adv.
Ms. Jarna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Yunus Malik, Adv.
Mr. Devesh Maurya, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Akshay Verma, AoR
Mr. Udit, Adv.
Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv.
Mr. Aravindh S., AoR
Mr. Akshay Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Aadithya Aravindh, Adv.
Miss Madhulika Upadhyay, AoR
Mrs. Aishwray Bhati, A.S.G.
Mrs. Madhulika Upadhyay, AoR, Adv.
Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv.
Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. A Deb Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Rahul Khurana, AoR
Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.
Ms. Bhavya Singla, Adv.
Mr. R. Venkataramani, Attorney General for India
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.
Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AoR
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Adv.
Mr. Ashiwan Mishra, Adv.
Ms. Aditi Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Suraj, Adv.
5
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, A.A.G.
Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AoR
Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Adv.
Ms. Srishti Jain, Adv.
Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv.
Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv.
Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv.
Mr. Siddhesh Shirish Kotwal, AoR
Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv.
Mr. T. Illayarasu, Adv.
Ms. Anupriya Poddar, Adv.
Mr. Manohar Pratap, AoR
Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AoR
Mr. Rajdeepak Rastogi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sarthak Rastogi, Adv.
Mr. Nishit Agrawal, AoR
Mr. Devesh Yadav, Adv.
Ms. Kanishka Mittal, Adv.
Ms. Deepti Rathi, Adv.
Mr. Prashanto Chandra Sen, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Kavitha Nithyanandan Rameshwar, AAG
Mr. B. Karunakaran, AoR
Mr. Shoaib Fazil S., Adv.
Ms. Rajlakshmi Singh, Adv.
Ms. Pooja Lakshmi, Adv.
Ms. Jayasri, Adv.
(For the State of Tamil Nadu)
Ms. G. Indira, AoR
Mr. K. V. Mohan, AoR
Mr. Devadatt Kamat, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AoR
Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Revanta Solanki, Adv.
Ms. Vanshika Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Tewari, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Eliza Barr, Adv.
Ms. Anjali Saxena, Adv.
Mr. Govind Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya Rajawat, Adv.
6
Ms. Akansha, AoR
Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AoR
Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Tripathi, Adv.
Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Advocate General, Bihar
Mr. Manish Kumar, AoR
Mr. Divyansh Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Kumar Saurav, Adv.
Ms. Nidhi Mittal, AoR
Mr. Gurjas Singh Narula, Adv.
Mr. Tirupati Gaurav Shahi, Adv.
Ms. Sugandha Jain, Sc, Adv.
Mr. Prabodh Kumar, AoR
Ms. Aastha Mehta, Adv.
Mr. Gursharan H. Virk, Adv.
Mr. Simranjit H. Virk, Adv.
Ms. Nancy Sheth, Adv.
Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AoR
Ms. Prerana Mohapatra, Adv.
Ms. Prina Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Priyal Sheth, Adv.
Mr. Mohit Paul, AoR
Ms. Rangoli Seth, Adv.
Mr. Rohit, Adv.
Mr. Anurag Pratyush Sahay, AoR
Ms. Pallavi Langar, AoR
Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ashritsai Torgal, Adv.
Mr. Abhishekh Singh, Adv.
For M/s Nuli & Nuli, AoR
Ms. Manisha T. Karia, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AoR
Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG
Mr. Sharan Dev Singh Thakur, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Ruchika Goel, Adv.
Mr. Ratnesh Chandra, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Verma,
Mr. Suyash Mohan Guru, Adv.
Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, AoR
Mr. Dhruv Joshi, Adv.
(For Bhopal Municipal Corporation/ Lucknow
Development Authority)
7
Mr. H. K. Chaturvedi, AoR
Mrs. Anjali Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Sagar Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AoR
Mr. Karun Shamra, Adv.
Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv.
Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.
Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, AoR
Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv,
Mr. Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Adv.
Mr. T.K. Nayak, Adv.
Mr. Daniel Stone Lyngdoh, Adv.
Ms. Marbiang Khongwir, Adv.
(For state of Meghalaya)
Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AoR
Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.
Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv.
Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv.
Ms. Yanmi Phazang, Adv.
Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AoR
Dr. Niranjan Moharana, Adv.
Mr. Amitabh Panda, Adv.
Ms. Laxmi, Adv.
Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G.
Ms. Shalini Singh, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, AoR
Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AoR
Mr. Basava Prabhu S Patil, Advocate General
(For the State of Sikkim)
Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, AoR
Ms. Yachna Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Arushi Chopra, Adv.
Mr. Nalin Talwar, Adv.
Ms. Devina Sehgal, AoR
Mr. Srikanth Varma Mudunuru, Adv.
Mr. Yatharth Kansal, Adv.
Mr. Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv.
Mr. Shashank Singh, AoR
Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AoR
Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv.
8
Mr. Varij Nayan Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, AoR
Mr. Swapnil Pattanayak, Adv.
Ms. Kratika Kushwaha, Adv.
Mr. S.D. Sanjay, A.S.G.
Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Praveen Swarup, AoR
Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv.
Mr. Prahalad Balaji, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Swarup, Adv.
Ms. Jarna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Yunus Malik, Adv.
Mr. Devesh Maurya, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Akshay Verma, AoR
Mr. Udit, Adv.
Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv.
Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv.
Mr. Vineet Singh, Adv.
Ms. Osheen Sain, Adv.
Mr. Krishna Kant Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AoR
Mr. Rachit Mittal, Adv.
Mr. Parish Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Kanishk Raj, Adv.
Mr. Aravindh S., AoR
Mr. Akshay Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Aadithya Aravindh, Adv.
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.
Ms. Madhulika Upadhyay, AoR
Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv.
Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Rahul Khurana, AoR
Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.
Ms. Bhavya Singla, Adv.
Mr. R. Venkataramani, Attorney General for India
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.
Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AoR
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Adv.
Mr. Ashiwan Mishra, Adv.
9
Ms. Aditi Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Suraj, Adv.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, A.A.G.
Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AoR
Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Adv.
Ms. Srishti Jain, Adv.
Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv.
Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv.
Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv.
Mr. Siddhesh Shirish Kotwal, AoR
Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv.
Mr. T.illayarasu, Adv.
Ms. Anupriya Poddar, Adv.
Mr. Rajdeepak Rastogi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sarthak Rastogi, Adv.
Mr. Nishit Agrawal, AoR
Mr. Devesh Yadav, Adv.
Ms. Kanishka Mittal, Adv.
Ms. Deepti Rathi, Adv.
Mr. Manohar Pratap, AoR
Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AoR
Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Shivam Saksena, Adv.
Mr. Binay Kr. Das, AoR
Ms. Shreyasi Kunwar, Adv.
(For GNOIDA)
Mr. Anando Mukherjee, AoR
Mr. Shwetank Singh, Adv.
Mr. Utkarsh Anand, Adv.
(For the State of Mizoram)
Mr. Mrinal Elker, Adv.
O R D E R
Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, learned Amicus Curiae (Senior
Advocate) and learned senior counsel/counsel for the parties.
2. Apropos issue(s) relating to the Bhopal Municipal Corporation,
we have been informed that upon survey, about 1,000 notices have
10
been issued and many places sealed pursuant thereto and further
that, consequential orders have also been passed. However, it was
brought to the notice of the Court by Mr. K.M. Nataraj, learned
Additional Solicitor General1, representing the said Municipal
Corporation that the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur in
various cases has granted stay/interim relief, as people have
bypassed the statutory mechanism under the concerned statute and
directly approached the High Court.
3. Learned Amicus Curiae submits that under similar
circumstances, coordinate Benches have been constrained to direct
that consequences as per the Orders passed in those cases by this
Court should prevail irrespective of any order passed by the High
Court or the statutory forum.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid position, we may be constrained
to pass similar Order(s). We would request learned Amicus Curiae to
compile a list of such Order(s) as passed by Coordinate Benches of
this Court, to enable us to examine what Order is called for on the
next date.
5. For the present, we request the Madhya Pradesh High Court to
endeavour to decide the cases where it has granted stay/interim
relief, within six weeks hereafter.
6. At this juncture, our attention was drawn to the fact that
initially the Bhopal Municipal Corporation had sealed about 100
premises, but later, the seals were removed by the same authority.
7. On our query, Mr. Nataraj, learned ASG, drew the attention of
the Court to an administrative order issued by the Government of
1 ‘ASG’.
11
Madhya Pradesh, General Administration Department, dated
02.08.2026, whereby a 10-Member Committee has been constituted,
purportedly, to come up with suggestions for procedural and policy
decision-making to ensure compliance of the Judgment in Rajendra
Kumar Barjatya v U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, 2024 INSC 990 dated
17.12.2024, penned by one us (R. Mahadevan, J.) and our Order dated
20.05.2026 in the present proceeding.
8. Learned counsel for the State of Madhya Pradesh submits that
the administrative order supra is clarificatory in nature, at best,
as the Government of Madhya Pradesh wishes to have a clear-cut
policy on the matter.
9. We have no hesitation to hold that the said administrative
order is prima facie contemptuous and seems intended to interfere
with the administration of justice. Accordingly, the administrative
order shall be kept in abeyance with immediate effect. Original
file and records leading up to the constitution of this Committee
be placed before us on the next date. Formal notice of contempt to
the concerned may follow thereupon. Let this serve as a deterrent
for any further/similar attempt to interfere with the directions
issued by this Court.
10. Coming to the Patna Municipal Corporation, pursuant to our
earlier Order, a fresh affidavit has been filed bringing on record
the fact that after the survey conducted, as of now, a total of
26,746 cases have been found, where residential property has been
put to non-residential/commercial use. The figure itself leaves
nothing to doubt that there has been total abdication of
12
responsibility on behalf of the concerned Municipal Commissioners.
The Patna Municipal Corporation was not even aware of such wide-
spread violation and the alleged violators, till the time this
Court took up the matter. We are informed that the present
incumbent has been on the post since October 2025 and prior
thereto, Mr. Animesh Kumar Parashar, I.A.S., was posted from
26.11.2021 to 04.10.2025 i.e., for close to four years.
11. In the affidavit filed by Mr. Parashar, I.A.S., it is stated
that his tenure saw about 500 cases pertaining to violations of
municipal bye-laws, of which 81 cases were initiated suo motu and
orders were passed in 129 cases and besides these, more than 397
complaints and 22 miscellaneous cases were dealt with by him in
accordance with law.
12. We find no justification in such figures for an officer who
held the post for almost four years. It, tentatively, shows that
the officer had no real concern with regard to what was transpiring
on the ground level.
13. In the aforesaid background, we put him to notice, as to why,
the Court may not pass appropriate orders against him for such
slackness shown during his term as Municipal Commissioner, Patna
Municipal Corporation. He shall be personally present before this
Court along with his Show-Cause on the next date.
14. We are also not satisfied with the action taken by the present
Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation inasmuch as the
notices have still not been served to a majority of the alleged
violators.
13
15. We are assured by Mr. S. D. Sanjay, learned Advocate General,
State of Bihar that latest within four weeks from date, notices
shall be served on all concerned. Let the same be positively done.
16. Compliance affidavits be filed by all concerned, latest within
four weeks from today.
17. Though, on 04.08.2026 (Para 28), we had directed States/UTs
which had not deposited Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to
deposit Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) by today, as formally they
have been made parties only yesterday, the time to deposit
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) stands extended till next
Tuesday i.e., 11.08.2026. Needful be done by that date. Apropos
other States, where the concerned Municipal Corporations or other
statutory bodies have deposited monies on behalf of the concerned
State/UT, they shall be reimbursed by the concerned State/UT. Same
indulgence is extended to all who deposit the amounts by
11.08.2026.
18. The amounts lying with the Registry be deposited in an
interest-bearing fixed deposit initially for a period of three
months with auto-renewal facility.
19. The direction for carrying out a physical survey of specified
areas under the New Delhi Municipal Council2 and Municipal
Corporation of Delhi3, the exercise has not been completed. Though
we are thoroughly dissatisfied with the manner in which the
concerned parties have coordinated amongst themselves, we refrain
from passing coercive orders, in praesenti. Accordingly, and as
2 ‘NDMC’.
3 ‘MCD’.
14
informed by the learned counsel for IIT-Delhi that two Professors
have been deputed for the exercise and now only draftsmen remain to
be nominated, we substitute our earlier direction. Let NDMC and MCD
provide two competent draftsmen each for the purpose. Exercise be
carried out in terms of Order dated 09.07.2026, at any rate within
three weeks from today, without fail.
20. The survey in Lucknow be also completed within a period of
three weeks from today.
21. Reports be submitted to the learned Amicus Curiae.
22. In terms of yesterday’s order, Mr. Prathmesh Kumar, presently
Vice-Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority, is present in the
Court and has filed an affidavit. Apology has been tendered. Though
the same is not in the form of a reply to the Show-Cause, he has
indicated the steps undertaken as also action taken against the
officers involved in/responsible for blatant violation of municipal
laws.
23. It has been submitted that 51 properties have been identified
and action initiated, which would be taken to its logical
conclusion without delay. It was further submitted that follow-up
exercise would continue in the entire jurisdictional span of the
Lucknow Development Authority on a war-footing.
24. Let the same be completed within three weeks. The State of
Uttar Pradesh is also directed to ensure that the proceedings
started are taken up seriously and conducted expeditiously, without
any slackness or favouritism or indulgence being shown to the
delinquent officers concerned. The Vice-Chairman, Lucknow
15
Development Authority, has assured that the Presenting Officer(s)
would be a person(s) of impeccable integrity competent to handle
the said.
25. Mr. Nataraj, learned ASG, assured that the Court would not
find the Vice-Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority, lacking in
bona fide.
26. Having regard to the aforesaid, we accept the apology tendered
by the Vice-Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority. Issue relating
to contempt stands closed. His personal appearance also stands
dispensed with, for the present.
27. List on 15.09.2026 at 2 PM.
(SACHIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA) (SAPNA BISHT) (ANJALI PANWAR)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
16
ITEM NO.310 COURT NO.10 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No.17103/2026
[Emanating from the Final Judgment and Order dated 18-02-2026
passed in SLP (Civil) No.8044/2025 passed by this Court]
LOGANATHAN Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU Respondents
[IA No.157121/2026 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No.156839/2026 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No.152525/2026 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No.182915/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN DEPOSITING COST
IA No.156984/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No.156840/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No.157127/2026 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No.156982/2026 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No.152528/2026 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT]
DATE : 05-08-2026 This matter was called for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. (Amicus Curiae),
Mr. Govind Jee, AoR
Mr. Naveen Soni, Adv.
Mr. Shaswat Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Adv.
For Petitioner :Ms. Purnima Krishna, AoR
Mr. N. Rajaraman, AoR
For Respondents :Ms. G. Indira, AoR
Mr. Prashanto Chandra Sen, AAG/Sr. Adv.
Mr. B. Karunakaran, AoR
Ms. Jayasri, Adv.
Mr. K. V. Mohan, AoR
Mr. Devadatt Kamat, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AoR
Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Revanta Solanki, Adv.
Ms. Vanshika Singh, Adv.
17
Mr. Ajay Tewari, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Eliza Barr, Adv.
Ms. Anjali Saxena, Adv.
Mr. Govind Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya Rajawat, Adv.
Ms. Akansha, AoR
Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AoR
Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Tripathi, Adv.
Mr. S.D. Sanjay Bihar, Advocate General
Mr. Manish Kumar, AoR
Mr. Divyansh Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Kumar Saurav, Adv.
Ms. Nidhi Mittal, AoR
Mr. Gurjas Singh Narula, Adv.
Mr. Tirupati Gaurav Shahi, Adv.
Ms. Sugandha Jain, Sc, Adv.
Mr. Prabodh Kumar, AoR
Ms. Aastha Mehta, Adv.
Mr. Gursharan H. Virk, Adv.
Mr. Simranjit H. Virk, Adv.
Ms. Nancy Sheth, Adv.
Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AoR
Ms. Prerana Mohapatra, Adv.
Ms. Prina Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Priyal Sheth, Adv.
Mr. Mohit Paul, AoR
Ms. Rangoli Seth, Adv.
Mr. Rohit, Adv.
Mr. Anurag Pratyush Sahay, AoR
Ms. Pallavi Langar, AoR
M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AoR
Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ashritsai Torgal, Adv.
Mr. Abhishekh Singh, Adv.
Ms. Manisha T. Karia, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AoR
Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, AoR
Mr. H. K. Chaturvedi, AoR
Mrs. Anjali Chaturvedi, Adv.
18
Mr. Sagar Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AoR
Mr. Karun Shamra, Adv.
Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv.
Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.
Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, AoR
Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AoR
Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.
Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv.
Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv.
Ms. Yanmi Phazang, Adv.
(For State of Nagaland)
Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AoR
Dr. Niranjan Moharana, Adv.
Mr. Amitabh Panda, Adv.
Ms. Laxmi, Adv.
Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G.
Ms. Shalini Singh, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, AoR
Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AoR
Dr. K. P. Kylasanatha Pillay, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Nitish Pande, Adv.
Ms. Rashmi Singhania, AoR
(for Municipal Commissioner, Kerala,
Thiruvananthpuram)
Mr. Manohar Pratap, AoR
Mr. Daksh Kidian, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Mishra, AoR
Mr. Basava Prabhu S Patil, Adv. Gen.
for State of Sikkim, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, AoR
Ms. Yachna Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Arushi Chopra, Adv.
Mr. Nalin Talwar, Adv.
Ms. Devina Sehgal, AoR
Mr. Srikanth Varma Mudunuru, Adv.
Mr. Yatharth Kansal, Adv.
Mr. Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv.
Mr. Shashank Singh, AoR
19
Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AoR
Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Varij Nayan Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, AoR
Mr. Swapnil Pattanayak, Adv.
Ms. Kratika Kushwaha, Adv.
Mr. Praveen Swarup, AoR
Mr. S.D. Sanjay, A.S.G.
Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv.
Mr. Prahalad Balaji, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Swarup, Adv.
Ms. Jarna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Yunus Malik, Adv.
Mr. Devesh Maurya, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Akshay Verma, AoR
Mr. Udit, Adv.
Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv.
Mr. Aravindh S., AoR
Mr. Akshay Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Aadithya Aravindh, Adv.
Miss Madhulika Upadhyay, AoR
Mrs. Aishwray Bhati, A.S.G.
Mrs. Madhulika Upadhyay, AoR, Adv.
Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv.
Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. A Deb Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Rahul Khurana, AoR
Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.
Ms. Bhavya Singla, Adv.
Mr. R. Venkataramani, Attorney General for India
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.
Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AoR
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Adv.
Mr. Ashiwan Mishra, Adv.
Ms. Aditi Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Suraj, Adv.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, A.A.G.
20
Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AoR
Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Adv.
Ms. Srishti Jain, Adv.
Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv.
Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv.
Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv.
Mr. Siddhesh Shirish Kotwal, AoR
Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv.
Mr. T. Illayarasu, Adv.
Ms. Anupriya Poddar, Adv.
Mr. Manohar Pratap, AoR
Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AoR
Mr. Rajdeepak Rastogi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sarthak Rastogi, Adv.
Mr. Nishit Agrawal, AoR
Mr. Devesh Yadav, Adv.
Ms. Kanishka Mittal, Adv.
Ms. Deepti Rathi, Adv.
Mr. Prashanto Chandra Sen, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Kavitha Nithyanandan Rameshwar, AAG
Mr. B. Karunakaran, AoR
Mr. Shoaib Fazil S., Adv.
Ms. Rajlakshmi Singh, Adv.
Ms. Pooja Lakshmi, Adv.
Ms. Jayasri, Adv.
(For the State of Tamil Nadu)
Ms. G. Indira, AoR
Mr. K. V. Mohan, AoR
Mr. Devadatt Kamat, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AoR
Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Revanta Solanki, Adv.
Ms. Vanshika Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Tewari, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Eliza Barr, Adv.
Ms. Anjali Saxena, Adv.
Mr. Govind Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya Rajawat, Adv.
Ms. Akansha, AoR
Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AoR
21
Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Tripathi, Adv.
Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Advocate General, Bihar
Mr. Manish Kumar, AoR
Mr. Divyansh Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Kumar Saurav, Adv.
Ms. Nidhi Mittal, AoR
Mr. Gurjas Singh Narula, Adv.
Mr. Tirupati Gaurav Shahi, Adv.
Ms. Sugandha Jain, Sc, Adv.
Mr. Prabodh Kumar, AoR
Ms. Aastha Mehta, Adv.
Mr. Gursharan H. Virk, Adv.
Mr. Simranjit H. Virk, Adv.
Ms. Nancy Sheth, Adv.
Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AoR
Ms. Prerana Mohapatra, Adv.
Ms. Prina Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Priyal Sheth, Adv.
Mr. Mohit Paul, AoR
Ms. Rangoli Seth, Adv.
Mr. Rohit, Adv.
Mr. Anurag Pratyush Sahay, AoR
Ms. Pallavi Langar, AoR
Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ashritsai Torgal, Adv.
Mr. Abhishekh Singh, Adv.
For M/s Nuli & Nuli, AoR
Ms. Manisha T. Karia, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AoR
Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG
Mr. Sharan Dev Singh Thakur, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Ruchika Goel, Adv.
Mr. Ratnesh Chandra, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Verma,
Mr. Suyash Mohan Guru, Adv.
Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, AoR
Mr. Dhruv Joshi, Adv.
(For Bhopal Municipal Corporation/ Lucknow
Development Authority)
Mr. H. K. Chaturvedi, AoR
Mrs. Anjali Chaturvedi, Adv.
22
Mr. Sagar Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AoR
Mr. Karun Shamra, Adv.
Ms. Anupama Ngangom, Adv.
Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.
Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, AoR
Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv,
Mr. Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Adv.
Mr. T.K. Nayak, Adv.
Mr. Daniel Stone Lyngdoh, Adv.
Ms. Marbiang Khongwir, Adv.
(For state of Meghalaya)
Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AoR
Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.
Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv.
Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv.
Ms. Yanmi Phazang, Adv.
Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AoR
Dr. Niranjan Moharana, Adv.
Mr. Amitabh Panda, Adv.
Ms. Laxmi, Adv.
Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G.
Ms. Shalini Singh, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, AoR
Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AoR
Mr. Basava Prabhu S Patil, Advocate General
(For the State of Sikkim)
Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, AoR
Ms. Yachna Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Arushi Chopra, Adv.
Mr. Nalin Talwar, Adv.
Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Shaurya Sahay, AoR
Ms. Devina Sehgal, AoR
Mr. Srikanth Varma Mudunuru, Adv.
Mr. Yatharth Kansal, Adv.
Mr. Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv.
Mr. Shashank Singh, AoR
Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AoR
Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv.
23
Mr. Varij Nayan Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, AoR
Mr. Swapnil Pattanayak, Adv.
Ms. Kratika Kushwaha, Adv.
Mr. S.D. Sanjay, A.S.G.
Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Praveen Swarup, AoR
Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv.
Mr. Prahalad Balaji, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Swarup, Adv.
Ms. Jarna Singh, Adv.
Mr. Yunus Malik, Adv.
Mr. Devesh Maurya, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Akshay Verma, AoR
Mr. Udit, Adv.
Ms. Sushma Verma, Adv.
Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv.
Mr. Vineet Singh, Adv.
Ms. Osheen Sain, Adv.
Mr. Krishna Kant Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AoR
Mr. Rachit Mittal, Adv.
Mr. Parish Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Kanishk Raj, Adv.
Mr. Aravindh S., AoR
Mr. Akshay Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Aadithya Aravindh, Adv.
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.
Ms. Madhulika Upadhyay, AoR
Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv.
Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Rahul Khurana, AoR
Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.
Ms. Bhavya Singla, Adv.
Mr. R. Venkataramani, Attorney General for India
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.
Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AoR
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Adv.
Mr. Ashiwan Mishra, Adv.
24
Ms. Aditi Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Suraj, Adv.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G.
Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, A.A.G.
Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AoR
Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Adv.
Ms. Srishti Jain, Adv.
Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv.
Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv.
Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv.
Mr. Siddhesh Shirish Kotwal, AoR
Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv.
Mr. T.illayarasu, Adv.
Ms. Anupriya Poddar, Adv.
Mr. Rajdeepak Rastogi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sarthak Rastogi, Adv.
Mr. Nishit Agrawal, AoR
Mr. Devesh Yadav, Adv.
Ms. Kanishka Mittal, Adv.
Ms. Deepti Rathi, Adv.
Mr. Manohar Pratap, AoR
Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AoR
Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Shivam Saksena, Adv.
Mr. Binay Kr. Das, AoR
Ms. Shreyasi Kunwar, Adv.
(For GNOIDA)
Mr. Anando Mukherjee, AoR
Mr. Shwetank Singh, Adv.
Mr. Utkarsh Anand, Adv.
(For the State of Mizoram)
Mr. Mrinal Elker, Adv.
O R D E R
Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, learned Amicus Curiae (Senior
Advocate) and learned senior counsel/counsel for the parties.
2. Apropos issue(s) relating to the Bhopal Municipal Corporation,
we have been informed that upon survey, about 1,000 notices have
25
been issued and many places sealed pursuant thereto and further
that, consequential orders have also been passed. However, it was
brought to the notice of the Court by Mr. K.M. Nataraj, learned
Additional Solicitor General4, representing the said Municipal
Corporation that the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur in
various cases has granted stay/interim relief, as people have
bypassed the statutory mechanism under the concerned statute and
directly approached the High Court.
3. Learned Amicus Curiae submits that under similar
circumstances, coordinate Benches have been constrained to direct
that consequences as per the Orders passed in those cases by this
Court should prevail irrespective of any order passed by the High
Court or the statutory forum.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid position, we may be constrained
to pass similar Order(s). We would request learned Amicus Curiae to
compile a list of such Order(s) as passed by Coordinate Benches of
this Court, to enable us to examine what Order is called for on the
next date.
5. For the present, we request the Madhya Pradesh High Court to
endeavour to decide the cases where it has granted stay/interim
relief, within six weeks hereafter.
6. At this juncture, our attention was drawn to the fact that
initially the Bhopal Municipal Corporation had sealed about 100
premises, but later, the seals were removed by the same authority.
7. On our query, Mr. Nataraj, learned ASG, drew the attention of
the Court to an administrative order issued by the Government of
4 ‘ASG’.
26
Madhya Pradesh, General Administration Department, dated
02.08.2026, whereby a 10-Member Committee has been constituted,
purportedly, to come up with suggestions for procedural and policy
decision-making to ensure compliance of the Judgment in Rajendra
Kumar Barjatya v U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, 2024 INSC 990 dated
17.12.2024, penned by one us (R. Mahadevan, J.) and our Order dated
20.05.2026 in the present proceeding.
8. Learned counsel for the State of Madhya Pradesh submits that
the administrative order supra is clarificatory in nature, at best,
as the Government of Madhya Pradesh wishes to have a clear-cut
policy on the matter.
9. We have no hesitation to hold that the said administrative
order is prima facie contemptuous and seems intended to interfere
with the administration of justice. Accordingly, the administrative
order shall be kept in abeyance with immediate effect. Original
file and records leading up to the constitution of this Committee
be placed before us on the next date. Formal notice of contempt to
the concerned may follow thereupon. Let this serve as a deterrent
for any further/similar attempt to interfere with the directions
issued by this Court.
10. Coming to the Patna Municipal Corporation, pursuant to our
earlier Order, a fresh affidavit has been filed bringing on record
the fact that after the survey conducted, as of now, a total of
26,746 cases have been found, where residential property has been
put to non-residential/commercial use. The figure itself leaves
nothing to doubt that there has been total abdication of
27
responsibility on behalf of the concerned Municipal Commissioners.
The Patna Municipal Corporation was not even aware of such wide-
spread violation and the alleged violators, till the time this
Court took up the matter. We are informed that the present
incumbent has been on the post since October 2025 and prior
thereto, Mr. Animesh Kumar Parashar, I.A.S., was posted from
26.11.2021 to 04.10.2025 i.e., for close to four years.
11. In the affidavit filed by Mr. Parashar, I.A.S., it is stated
that his tenure saw about 500 cases pertaining to violations of
municipal bye-laws, of which 81 cases were initiated suo motu and
orders were passed in 129 cases and besides these, more than 397
complaints and 22 miscellaneous cases were dealt with by him in
accordance with law.
12. We find no justification in such figures for an officer who
held the post for almost four years. It, tentatively, shows that
the officer had no real concern with regard to what was transpiring
on the ground level.
13. In the aforesaid background, we put him to notice, as to why,
the Court may not pass appropriate orders against him for such
slackness shown during his term as Municipal Commissioner, Patna
Municipal Corporation. He shall be personally present before this
Court along with his Show-Cause on the next date.
14. We are also not satisfied with the action taken by the present
Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation inasmuch as the
notices have still not been served to a majority of the alleged
violators.
28
15. We are assured by Mr. S. D. Sanjay, learned Advocate General,
State of Bihar that latest within four weeks from date, notices
shall be served on all concerned. Let the same be positively done.
16. Compliance affidavits be filed by all concerned, latest within
four weeks from today.
17. Though, on 04.08.2026 (Para 28), we had directed States/UTs
which had not deposited Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to
deposit Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) by today, as formally they
have been made parties only yesterday, the time to deposit
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) stands extended till next
Tuesday i.e., 11.08.2026. Needful be done by that date. Apropos
other States, where the concerned Municipal Corporations or other
statutory bodies have deposited monies on behalf of the concerned
State/UT, they shall be reimbursed by the concerned State/UT. Same
indulgence is extended to all who deposit the amounts by
11.08.2026.
18. The amounts lying with the Registry be deposited in an
interest-bearing fixed deposit initially for a period of three
months with auto-renewal facility.
19. The direction for carrying out a physical survey of specified
areas under the New Delhi Municipal Council5 and Municipal
Corporation of Delhi6, the exercise has not been completed. Though
we are thoroughly dissatisfied with the manner in which the
concerned parties have coordinated amongst themselves, we refrain
from passing coercive orders, in praesenti. Accordingly, and as
5 ‘NDMC’.
6 ‘MCD’.
29
informed by the learned counsel for IIT-Delhi that two Professors
have been deputed for the exercise and now only draftsmen remain to
be nominated, we substitute our earlier direction. Let NDMC and MCD
provide two competent draftsmen each for the purpose. Exercise be
carried out in terms of Order dated 09.07.2026, at any rate within
three weeks from today, without fail.
20. The survey in Lucknow be also completed within a period of
three weeks from today.
21. Reports be submitted to the learned Amicus Curiae.
22. In terms of yesterday’s order, Mr. Prathmesh Kumar, presently
Vice-Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority, is present in the
Court and has filed an affidavit. Apology has been tendered. Though
the same is not in the form of a reply to the Show-Cause, he has
indicated the steps undertaken as also action taken against the
officers involved in/responsible for blatant violation of municipal
laws.
23. It has been submitted that 51 properties have been identified
and action initiated, which would be taken to its logical
conclusion without delay. It was further submitted that follow-up
exercise would continue in the entire jurisdictional span of the
Lucknow Development Authority on a war-footing.
24. Let the same be completed within three weeks. The State of
Uttar Pradesh is also directed to ensure that the proceedings
started are taken up seriously and conducted expeditiously, without
any slackness or favouritism or indulgence being shown to the
delinquent officers concerned. The Vice-Chairman, Lucknow
30
Development Authority, has assured that the Presenting Officer(s)
would be a person(s) of impeccable integrity competent to handle
the said.
25. Mr. Nataraj, learned ASG, assured that the Court would not
find the Vice-Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority, lacking in
bona fide.
26. Having regard to the aforesaid, we accept the apology tendered
by the Vice-Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority. Issue relating
to contempt stands closed. His personal appearance also stands
dispensed with, for the present.
27. List on 15.09.2026 at 2 PM.
(SACHIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA) (SAPNA BISHT) (ANJALI PANWAR)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR